Thursday, September 3, 2015
Research Scenerio Part 2
In my opinion, the author in this article uses a lot of valid research and information. The writer used a lot of primary source transcripts, by interviewing the teacher and the students who received the unauthorized information. They also used public records to enforce their statement, by adding the percentage of students that passed the EOCT evolution and creationism section of their test. Noticing that the number was greater for passing purposes just for that specific teacher whom had taught it. To me that information was very valid. Not only did they interviewed the teacher and students but also the principle to get a good perspective on what should be taught in the freshman biology curriculum. We also receive information about sunshine laws, and how the teacher could be fined. Overall, it was a very convincing piece.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I agree that the info was valid, but the primary teacher involved refused to be interviewed. The EOCT stat was included by the principal in his interview defending the teacher. So it's secondary. Otherwise, good job. 95.
ReplyDelete