NFL Story Response

I feel like this situation has many factors. However, it was very close between both the article and the NFLs passage explaining themselves. What seems the most "sketchy" to me was the fact that they had former NFL participant move to working with a tabbaco company. To then later find out that the only other reason they contacted him was because of someone in Washington DC. Even thought it had been a couple years since that worker left. Why would they contact them just once after several years. In my opinion there is a lot of loop holes, however I think used that argument to make my decision to let the Times keep it. You can never go wrong with records that the times more likely used.